Introduction
Central within the current debate on the impact of
the information and communication technologies are the theories of
the "global culture" and "cultural clashes", or global village and
clash of civilizations. According to the first theory (ICTs) will
generate global culture or American culture and homogenous religious
patterns; the cultural dimension of globalization. On the other
hand, theory of cultural clashes claims that ICTs intensifies
awareness of cultural differences that ultimately lead to cultural
clashes. From the Islamic intercultural communication perspective,
Islamic world communication values provide a "Third Way" based on
peaceful and democratic coexistence among different global cultures.
The "Third Way" also opposes the principles of both global culture
and cultural clashes. To use the words of Ali Izetbegovich, the
Muslim President of Bosnia: ... As Islam in the past was the
intermediary between the ancient cultures and the West, it must
again today, in a time of dramatic dilemmas and alternatives,
shoulder its role as intermediary nation in a divided world (Braibanti,
1999). By the same token, I argue that the universal intercultural
communication values of Islam could solve all the problems related
to and generated by the dominant global and homogenous culture
perspective, and those of the clash of cultures perspective. And
definitely, this is the meaning of the Third Way, the Islamic way.
In this paper, I also think that theories of global culture and
clash of cultures threaten the democratic intercultural
communication and undermine the potentials of the Islamic
intercultural communication.
Why the Third Way?
There are two competing views on what impact new
information and communication technologies have on culture, 1) those
scholars who argue that we can expect an increasingly unified global
culture and, 2) those scholars who expect culture to remain complex
and varied, and that these cultural differences may even lead to
future cultural clashes (Ellingsen, 2000). The main thesis of the
first vision is in line with the cultural imperialism theory, of
insisting on a single culture and prohibiting all other cultures,
including the languages that are not the language of the dominant
group (Kenneth, 1999). The dominant thesis of the second vision is
that the pattern of conflict in the era of globalization will follow
the fault- lines of civilizations. As Huntington states civilization
is the highest cultural grouping of people and the broodiest level
of cultural identity people has. Of all the elements, which defines
civilizations the most important is usually religion (Huntington,
1996). These two perspectives have generated and will be producing a
lot of troubles amongst peoples of the world as they threaten the
fundamental democratic bases on which the intercultural
communication must be built. They also undermine the basic need for
every civilization to preserve its identity and culture against any
external cultural attack while keeping a continuous interaction with
other cultures and civilizations. The Islamic perspective provides
Third Way based on a harmonious mix of global communication values
to safeguard a peaceful, tolerant, diversified and democratic
intercultural communication. In no other intercultural communication
perspective, can people interact and communicate peacefully, freely,
fairly, and tolerantly as in the Third Way. As Samovar and Porter
tell us when discussing worldviews in communication between
cultures, "knowing about religions can help us understand values and
behavior or at least find explanations for perceived behavior". This
is particularly true of Islam because, from its inception it has
been more than a religion – it has been an entire way of life for
its adherents. In order to understand the communicative implications
involved, an overview must be made of the basic universal values of
Islam. For Muslims, belief that religion is not separated from, but
rather organically related to, the state, encompassing both private
and public life, is rooted to the Qur’an and sayings of Prophet
Mohammad (Dick, and Robinson 1997).
The universality of Prophet Mohammed’s mission
(Peace be upon him) has been clearly confirmed by the Qur’an; it is
a logical consequence of the finality of his Prophethood. A prophet
after whom there was to be no other, had to be a guide and leader
for all men and for all ages. God has provided through him the
complete code that man needs to follow the right path, and this is
in itself supports the concept of finality, since without
completeness the need for other prophets would remain (Maududi,
1978). Islam comprehends and fulfils all the requirements of life,
past and future until the end of human existence on the earth
whether these requirements are spiritual, material, political,
economic, social, moral, intellectual, or aesthetic, in other words
Islam determines the rules, which should form the basis of social,
cultural relationship, economic, judicial, and political dealings,
maters of war and peace, and international affairs. The Prophet
brings with him a whole system of thought and action which in
Islamic terminology is called al –Din (a complete way of life) (Maududi,
1978). An important intercultural communication value is that Islam
confers the concept of the equality and brotherhood of all mankind.
It was from Muhammad that the world first heard the revolutionary
message of human equality." O Mankind, your God is one and you have
but one father" (Ali Nadvi, 1978).
In Islam, there is no distinction between private
and public conduct. The same moral code, which one observes at home,
applies to one’s conduct in public. This is true of every
institution of society and every department of government; all must
conform the laws of Islam (A, la Maududi, 1978). Islam also does not
recognize any division between the temporal and the spiritual since
man’s desire to propitiate God and follow His commands permeates
every fibre of human activity. Every one of man’s actions, his
behavior and morality, is guided by his motive, which, in the
terminology of religion is known as niyat or intention. The
intention or purpose with which any act is done is the criterion of
its moral worth (Ali Nadvi, 1978). It seems important to quote the
former U.S Attorney General Ramsey Clark (a man who has studied
Islam closely and who has traveled extensively throughout the Muslim
world) and who made the following observation in 1955 address before
an audience of Muslims and non-Muslims: "Islam is the best chance
the peoples of planet have for any hoop of decency of their lives,
for any hope for dignity in their lives. It is the one revolutionary
force that cares about humanity". According to Qur’an, Muslims are
entitled to cooperate with all nations regardless of their faiths
and to reject all kinds of extremism, oppression, and terrorism. The
Islamic community is encouraged to work with others to advance the
goals of peace, stability and social justice (Yaacob, 1994, &
Hamada, 2000). The remaining parts of this paper are devoted to a
critical analysis of both the global culture and the clash of
cultures perspectives followed by an assessment of the bases of the
Third Way.
Clash of Cultures Perspective
The "us/them confrontation is the most persistent
theme in world order perceptions. The dichotomy can take a variety
of forms- the native versus the foreigner, the friend versus the
foe, the familiar versus the strange, the Orient versus the West,
the North versus the South, the developed versus the developing
countries, and so on. This dichotomous framework of world
perceptions amounts to an iron law of dualism, a persistent
conceptualization of the world of us and them (Mazrui, 1980). To
what extent is this mode of thinking a product of culture and to
what extent is cultural dualism intensifying hostility between the
rest of the world and Islamic culture? It seems that the dichotomy
Islam /the West has recently gathered impetus as a result of a dual
perception arising from the post-Cold war division of the world into
east and west. In its search for a new enemy since the late 1980s,
it seems that the West has chosen to confront Islam, considering
cultural issues as the trigger for conflict. Why cultural or
civilization issues? It is clear that this is not unrelated to the
transformations the global system has undergone since the end of the
bipolar system. Such transformations have affected how the principle
of security is interpreted. Today’s societies and nations are indeed
dominated by the dialectic between universal integration and the
assertion of differences in a framework of regimes whose survival
depends more on their capacity to generate legitimacy and
institutional efficiency than on support from abroad. Instead of
understanding these ongoing changes within a socio- political or
human context, they are being used by some to support arguments
favor of civilization incompatibility (Munoz, 1999). In this context
relations between the Muslim world and the West are difficult and
marked by mutual suspicions. Mutual perceptions are greatly
influenced by the debate on values, which even in Western Europe is
no longer the domain of conservative circles. The debate serves an
obvious function: to prove one’s own superiority in the domain of
morals, ethics and humanity, and to deny those values to the other
(Kramer, 2000).
It is not also difficult for any observer to
understand that the West –in spite of being in many ethical and
moral troubles, has the nerve to offer itself as the obligatory
model for every other nation. Cultures not willing to imitate the
West are under threat of being marginalized. This was the true
message when Frances Fukuyama, in 1991 after the collapse of the
Soviet Union, proclaimed the "end of history". What he was saying
was that the so-called "Project of Modernity", also known as the
"American Way of Life or Macdonaldization", is the peak of
civilization, unsurpassable for all times. For those people, the
future globe will be divided only into the ever expanding West and
the rest. Samuel Huntington even predicted bloody clashes between
the two realms (Hoffman, 2000).
But why Islam? And why has the Islam / the West
dichotomy been put forward so insistently over the last few years?
Although a biased presentation of international events, such as the
Gulf War, or regional events such as those arising from the
confrontation between Arab and Islamist regimes, has no doubt
fostered the perception of a threat, the dichotomy established by
many between Islam and the West is based primarily on the false
perceptions which have been conveyed traditionally to different
peoples, as a result of a misinterpretation of history. Mohammed
Abed al – Jabri proposes in his book, the predominant historical
interpretation of West- Islam relations has been focused on the
ideological principle of antagonism (Byzantium against the Islamic
Empire; the Christian Kingdoms against al- Andalus; the Ottoman
Turks against Europe; Arab or Islamic against the West). On the
other hand, the Islamic expert Mohammed Arkoun points out, while
Christianity and Judaism were integrated in the West into what is
commonly known as the " Judaeo-Christian civilization, Islam was
peremptorily swept aside. The prejudices created by the Islamic –
Christian confrontation in Spain, in the Crusades or the fight
against the Turk, penetrated the Western collective subconscious so
deeply that Hichem Djait, in his book Europe and Islam (1990),
expresses doubts that they may ever be eliminated (Munoz, 1994).
Moratinos Angel points out that there have been many
turning points in the emerging of the recent European and Western
attitude towards Islam. Firstly, it was undoubtedly the article by
the American political scientist Samuel Huntington on the
inevitability of a clash between civilizations that caused the
greatest negative impact, given its intellectual and doctrinal
nature. Without a doubt, the article, published in the journal of
Foreign Affairs in the summer of 1993, paved the way for a series of
attitudes opposing Islam. The second turning point occurred as a
result of the unfortunate statements made by Willy Cales, the former
NATO secretary general. His justification of the NATO- Mediterranean
Countries talks revealed a subconscious full of false fears and new
threats. When he claimed that the priority aim of the talks was to
fight against "Islamic fundamentalism" he gave rise to legitimate
and fierce criticism, not only from some of the Arab states
involved, but also from NATO members themselves, particularly Spain.
A new declared crusade had been launched from the very hub of
Western military power. The "Desert Storm" operation was a military
success in the short term, but left in its wake deep- seated social
and psychological bitterness throughout the Arab world (Moratinos,
1999).
The author thinks that after the terrorist attack of
September 11, 2001, the debate around the question of clash of
civilizations has been intensified and many scholars have taken this
attack to support their notion about the clash between the Muslim
world and the West. However, it is imperative to emphasize two facts
in this respect; 1- Israel and its followers in the US and the West
have been trying to convince the West that the new "enemy" is the
entire Islamic world. The tragedy of September 11 came as a gift
from the sky to Israel and its supporters. They used the Taliban as
a representation of all Islam and Muslim nations, 2- Israel and its
followers in the U. S and the West have been trying to equate
Palestinian legitimate resistance to occupation with terrorism,
specially after the successful experience of the Lebanese resistance
movement (Al Hewar Editorial: January 2002). It is the American’s
policies and actions that preclude any possibility to achieve peace
in the Middle East. Bush support of Ariel Sharon, his grant of carte
blanch to Sharon’s actions in the occupied territories, his
declaration that Sharon is a "man of peace" precisely at the moment
when he is actively attempting to destroy the Palestinian and
nation, all indicate that U.S administration not only has a plan for
achieving Palestinian statehood, but does not care whether there
ever is a Palestinian state, or indeed the Palestinian people
survive. It is the Middle East question that perpetuates the
hostility between Muslim community in general and Arab world in
particular and the West. Muslim peoples have the right to believe
that if the West has a real intention to put an end for the Israeli
35 year occupation, it will force Israel to comply with the
international law and eliminate its brutal occupation. Muslims also
are wondering why does the West use its military power against the
illegitimate Iraqi occupation of Kuwait while supports Israel to
violate all U.N and Security Council resolutions concerning the Arab
Palestinian occupied territories? The American air strike against
Afghanistan, which has financially, politically, and military been
supported by the West is seen by the majority of Muslims as evidence
of the clash of civilizations. The last but not least is the
American invasion of Iraq without UN or Security Council ‘approval
and without any concrete evidence that Iraq has mass destruction
weapons is the most striking evidence of the intended clash with
Muslims. These events represent major turning points in reinforcing
a sense that the West is seriously involving in implementing the
scenario of the conflict with Muslim world civilization.
In addition to these military attacks, one has to
add the controversial tape of bin Laden that has been broadcasted
for the first time on October 7, 2001 via Al Jazeera Satellite
Television. The tape emphasizes the injustice done to the
Palestinians, the cruelty of continued sanctions against Iraq, the
presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, the support of repressive
governments in the Middle East. It seems that these arguments win a
good deal of popular sympathy among Muslims and Arabs. Bin Laden
exactly states "millions of innocent children are being killed in
Afghanistan as I speak, they are being killed in Iraq without
committing any sins and we do not hear any condemnation from the
rulers. By the end of the tape he said that neither America nor the
people who live in it would dream of security before we live it in
Palestinian, and not before all the infidel armies leave the land of
Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him" (Hamada, 2000 a).
To what extent the clash perspective has sound
claims or allegations towards Islam and Muslim world? Huntington and
others assert that Islamic culture explains in large part the
failure of democracy to emerge in much of the Muslim world. However,
the critical investigation of many studies shows that Islam is not
an obstacle to the evolution of a democratic polity. And it would
still be wrong to argue that Islamic culture is responsible for the
failure of democracy in the Muslim world when in fact some of the
most fundamental philosophical and political ideas and ideals in
Islam promote freedom, individual autonomy, accountability on the
part of the ruler, consultation with the people, respect for
different point of view, the independence of the judiciary and the
rule of law (Muzaffar, 2000). Hunter also refuses to accept the
inevitability of conflict between Islamic civilization and the West
because she believes that Muslims disagree with Western countries
over economic, social, and political issues. She also rejects the
notion that Islam is peculiarly incompatible with democracy, arguing
that Judaism and Christianity, not only Islam, are in conflict with
absolute secularism (As’ad, 1999). Esposito also makes it clear that
the issue of democratization like that of authoritarianism, in
Muslim societies is not primarily one of religion but of history and
political and economic development. Centuries of European colonial
rule followed by decades of authoritarian governments have created
and perpetuated conditions that are not conductive to
democratization. However, democracy nowadays is an integral part of
modern Islamic political thought and practice, accepted in many
Muslim countries as a litmus test by which both the openness of
government and the relevance of Islamic groups or other political
parties are certified (Esposito, 2000).
The author completely agrees with Muzaffar who noted
that Huntington contradicts himself when he said that Muslims are
the victims of violence, how can they be held responsible for
generating violence? Shouldn’t one distinguish the violence of the
victim from the violence of the aggressor? By what moral criteria
does one put both kinds of violence in the same bracket? In any
case, there is no justification at all for linking Islam to
violence. Huntington is also wrong in implying that Islam has a
problem with people of other religions. Quite the opposite. Islam
and Muslim empires, by and large, have an excellent record of
treating non-Muslim minorities with respect and decorum (Muzaffar,
2000). There are also those who believe that Western and Eastern
cultures are united not only by their religious roots, but also by a
common Greek heritage. During the high Middle Ages, the works of
Aristotle, which represents the ancient foundations of Western
scientific development, were made available to European scholars
through the translations of Arab philosophers such as Ibn Sina and
Ibn Rusched. In the same way, as the Renaissance in Europe could not
happened without the scientific achievements of the Islamic Orient,
the modern Islamic world was deeply influenced by Western ideas and
thinking. Napoleon’s expeditions to Egypt in 1798, for example,
triggered a process of modernization which was encouraged by the
Ottoman’s Sultan’s Governor in Egypt, Mohammed Ali (Hafez, 2000).
The big methodological mistake of the analysists of the clash
perspective is that they use the Western culture as a benchmark to
evaluate the Islamic culture. Therefore, they look at the
differences as points for conflicts and deny the right of others to
choose their own way of life. As a result, they pave the way that
will sooner or later threaten the democratic fundamental bases of
the intercultural communication. The author also completely agrees
with Abbas Malek and Krista Wiegand in their article " Islam and the
West: Cultural Encounters", when they tell us that the key problem
is a lack of cultural relatively, which allows one to judge another
culture by its standards rather than by using Western standards
(Malek & Wiegand, 1997). The second methodological problem of the
clash perspective is that collective and individual behavior
patterns among the peoples in Islamic countries are explained from
the viewpoint of an abstract notion of Islam rather than being
interpreted from a stance which takes into account geography and
local history, social structure and human experience (Munoz, 1999).
After Sep.11 2001, Muslims were depicted in the influential Western
media as if they are terrorists (Hamada, 2002a). But it is clear
that like Christianity and Judaism, Islam has no room for terrorism.
And like Christianity and Judaism, Islam has adherents who violate
its law in its name (Esposito, 2002).
Global Culture Perspective
The modern vision of the global village comes from
the communication theory. Marshall McLuhan focuses on the rise of
(and consequences of) electronic communication and rapid
transportation, and their effects on culture. The electronic
communication allowed people from different corners of the globe to
simultaneously experience the same culture. Globalization, according
to many theorists denotes, not only structural characteristics, but
also includes culture. This will lead to increasing levels of
tolerance and generate processes of cultural unification and
homogenization. People will become increasingly aware that they
belong to a global world, thus a global identity, mentality and
culture is growing. Another example of the potential for unified
global culture is Roland Robertson (1992). Robertson defines
globalization according to two elements, one structural and the
other clearly cultural: Globalization as a concept refers both to
the compression of the world and the intensification of
consciousness of the world as a whole both concrete global
interdependence and consciousness of the global whole in the
twentieth century (Ellingsen, 2000).
This perspective is mainly based on the idea that
globalization of the electronic mass media especially Internet has
established a new transnational identity and culture; the Western or
definitely American identity and culture. In this respect, the
author differentiates between two global phenomena; the first is the
penetration of the communication technologies, and the second is
dominance of the culture of the West. The first phenomenon does not
match the second. This assumption requires more investigations in
different cultural settings, as there will be different responses to
different perceived challenges. The point is that though the
penetration of the communication technologies is a universal
phenomenon, it does not bear any implication for acceptance of the
identity of the other. In the Arab world –for example- there are two
forces which coexist together; 1- the penetration of new media and
satellite television, and 2- the persistence of strong sense of Arab
National identity. Therefore, in many Arab countries, specially, the
Gulf region, the state invests in all available means of
communications with the belief that this investment will help
enhance the sense of national identity (Wheeler, 2000). Other
studies show that the new transnational media have also allowed the
reintegration of Arab emigrants into Arab life and society. No
longer cut off from their homelands, many Arabs living in the West
read Arab newspapers on the Internet and watch Arab satellite
channels (TBS, 1999). At the same time, Arabs have in some ways
adapted the new media to the expression of their own cultural
traditions and vice versa. (Hamada, 2000 b).
According to the previous discussion, it is safe to
say that theories about the inevitability of social, political, and
economic change toward globalization and homogenization
underestimate the resiliency of local identity and cultural
difference in the developing world and the Islamic world in
particular. Based on an empirical research in the Gulf area Hheeler
states that global culture is like putting together a culturally
incompatible orchestra: instruments are not standard issue, there is
more than one conductor, and not all musicians (if any) want to play
the same tune. Our new global culture might consist of shared
identities in the sense that communities will have increasing
capabilities to raise their voices to represent differences. The
north will continue to advocate the notion that Western knowledge is
power; that one of the most important manifestations of power is
making money; and that to make money in the age of rapid
technological change, one has to be on the ground floor of marketing
scientific discovery or at least partake of the charity that
Northern countries are willing to give if only cultures of the south
will adapt themselves to the prescripts of the global system.
The Third Way Perspective
A major purpose of this part is to analyze the
fundamental principles of the Islamic intercultural communication
perspective as an alternative to both the clash of civilizations and
the global culture perspectives. The alternative, or as I would like
to call it " the Third Way" can contribute a great deal to the
global civilization in general, and the intercultural communication
in particular. Its notion of a balance between "din", religion, and
"dunya", the world, is a worthy one. It can provide a corrective and
a check to the materialism that characterizes much of contemporary
civilizations, offering instead compassion, piety and a sense of
humanity. The Islamic principles which encourage flexibility and
rational choice are reflected in the exchange: ijtihad, independent
judgment; shura, consultation; and ijma, consensus. Clearly,
rationality and man’s own judgment play a significant part in
arriving at decisions. Islam also places knowledge at the highest
level of human endeavor. Reasoning and re-interpretation are
embedded in Islamic history and text. The following discourse
between the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Muadh ibn Jabal,
a judge, on his way to Yemen clearly indicates the principle:
Prophet: how will you decide a problem? Ibn Jabal: according to the
Qur’an. Prophet: if it is not in it? Ibn Jabal: according to the
Sunna (Islamic custom) Prophet: if it is not in that either? Ibn
Jabal: then I will use my own reasoning (Ahmed, 1992). The Third Way
presents itself as a way for the digital age. It would be useful to
quote Ali Mazrui’s analysis who wrote recently that Prophet Muhammad
moved from Mecca to Jerusalem in a single night in the Age of travel
by camel; he moved from earth to heavens during the same night
ascending from Jerusalem; and while in the heavens, the present age
communicated with the ages of the past, for Muhammad was able to
talk to Jesus, Moses and all the way back to Adam during the same
night. The Prophet was back in Mecca before morning, breaking at
least three barriers of cosmic experience: 1- killing distance
between Mecca and Jerusalem, 2- killing the distance between the
earth and the heavens, and 3- killing the distance between the past
and the present. It is in this sense that Islam prepared believers
for the age of the end of distance and the age of globalized digital
simultaneity (Mazrui, 1998).
It is not new to state that the Third Way
perspective very appreciate the value of democracy. The critical
investigation of many studies shows that Islam is not an obstacle to
the evolution of a democratic polity. And it would still be wrong to
argue that Islamic culture is responsible for the failure of
democracy in the Muslim world when in fact some of the most
fundamental philosophical and political ideas and ideals in Islam
promote freedom, individual autonomy, accountability on the part of
the ruler, consultation with the people, respect for different point
of view, the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law (Muzaffar,
2000). The Tunisian Islamist leader Rashid Ghannoushi provided an
early example of a governing democratic trend: " if by democracy is
meant the liberal model of government prevailing in the West, a
system under which the people freely choose their representative and
leaders, in which there is an alternation of power, as well as all
freedoms and human rights for the public, then Muslims will find
nothing in their religion to oppose democracy" (Esposito, 2002).
It is my belief that describing the Third Way as
incompatible with the democratic system of governance is completely
unfolded. Before any of the political systems known today, Islam has
called for the participation of all individuals in the political
life of their societies and has made sure that their contributions
is not weakened by restrictions. Allah has ordered His Prophet
Muhammad (peace be upon him) to take counsel with his companions on
matters of concern to the Muslim community. The second Caliph Umar
Ibn al- Khattab is known by his saying: May Allah blesses those who
point to my defects. It is also true that Islam is the religion,
which is most protective of human rights, as has been confirmed by
all the Islamic texts and Islamic life-style. Islam seeks to
safeguard all human rights, which are founded on two fundamental
principles: freedom and equality (Taher, 1997). However, most
accommodationists would agree that it is important for Muslims not
to uncritically copy what the West has done; emphasizing that there
are different forms that legitimate democracy can take. Iran’s
President Mohammad Khatami, in a television interview in June 2001
before his country’s presidential elections noted, "the existing
democracies do not necessarily follow one formula or aspect. It is
possible that democracy may lead to a socialist system. Or it is
possible that democracy may lead to a liberal system. Or it may be a
democracy with the inclusion of religious norms in the government.
We have accepted the third option. Khatami presents a view common
among the advocates of Islamic democracy that "today world
democracies are suffering from a major vacuum which is the vacuum of
spiritually, and that Islam can provide the framework for combining
democracy with spirituality and religious government (Esposito,
2002).
The Third Way is based also on one of the values
that are imperative for developing a just intercultural
communication. Justice is the hallmark of the Islamic system of
government since God commands Muslims to uphold the principles of
just dealings and fairness in setting disputes with non- Muslims.
The Qur’an teaches that human success and failure, gain and loss in
the ultimate sense depend on right faith, right knowledge and right
deeds integrated in a harmonious way. Right faith (iman) and right
deed (amal salih) are inseparable and constitute the two fundamental
conditions of salvations in this world and in the hereafter. The
essence of ethics in the Islamic world –view is found in the
following verse: " By [the token of time] [through the ages], verily
man is in loss, except such as have faith, and do righteous deeds,
and [join together] in the mutual teaching of truth, and of patience
and constancy." (Q. 103: 1-3), (Hassan, 1994).
Sadly, the old-new question about the terrorism and
Muslims is still being asked in the West and even by the elite.
Unfortunately, the other two intercultural communication
perspectives completely misunderstand the Islamic Jihad and
therefore undermine the potentials of the Third Way. Islam does not
call for wars except when the rights and freedom of Muslims are
threatened. The Qur’an states that: " Permission is hereby given to
those who are attacked, because they have been wronged. God has
power to grant them victory" (Hajj, 39). The Qur’an has also made it
clear that Muslims must not use their power to aggress other people:
" Fight for the sake of God those who fight against you, but do not
attack them first. God does not love the aggressors" (Baqara, 190).
In the world of today, which is known for cross-cultural contacts,
Jihad should take the form of cultural dialogues in the light of
peaceful coexistence (Taher, 1997). On the other hand, Islamic
scholars and religious leaders across the Muslim world such as those
at the Islamic Research Council at al- Azhar University, regarded by
many as the highest moral authority in Islam, have made strong,
authoritative declarations against bin Laden’s definition of jihad
(militant jihad). The declaration states that Islam provides clear
rules and ethical norms that forbid the killing of non- combatants,
as well as women, children, and the elderly, and also forbids the
pursuit of the enemy in defeat, the execution of those who
surrender, the inflictions of harm on prisoners of war, and the
destruction of property that is not being used in the hostilities
(Esposito, 2002). Islam also calls for a peaceful coexistence
between peoples and nations and urges Muslims to treat the
non-Muslims with kindness and equity: "God does not forbid you to be
kind and equitable to those who have neither made war on your
religion nor driven you from your homes (Mumtahina, 8).
In general, Muslims are often criticized for not
producing the best, but they are seldom congratulated for having
standards of behavior, which have averted the worst. There are
really no Muslims equivalents of systematic Nazi extermination
camps, nor Muslim conquest by genocide on the scale perpetrated by
Europeans in the Americas or Australia, nor Muslim versions of rigid
apartheid once approved by South African Dutch Reformed Church, nor
Muslim equivalents of the brutal racism of Japan before the end of
World War 11, nor can Islam be blamed for the only world wars in
human history (Mazrui, 1998). In line with this fact, Murad Hoffman
concludes that in contrast to the high Western ideals pronounced and
exported, what one discovers in terms of actual behavior is highly
disturbing: Slave- trading and apartheid; two savage world wars;
Stalinist massacres and the Nazi holocaust; ethnic cleaning in
Bosnia, and atomic warfare against civilians in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, the Israeli continuous terrorist military 35 year
occupation for the Arab Palestinian territories with unlimited
financial, political and military support of U.S and many European
countries. The U.S military attack against Afghanistan with killing
of thousands of civilians. The U.S invasion of Iraq beyond the
international law with hundred of thousands of innocent civilians
killed and injured without committing any sins except they are
resisting the occupation. These disasters were the bloodiest the
world has ever seen (Hoffman, 2000 b).
With regard to the ethics of the intercultural
communication of the Third Way, Islam does not permit, not even to a
journalist, to spy and seek to confirm suspicious, slander,
circulation of rumor, and name-calling. Islam has established strong
tradition of critical evaluation of the sources of news, use of
sound methods of verification, documentation of evidence and
testimony wherever possible, reporting within the proper context and
treating the subject fairly. In principle, the Muslim media should
serve the cause of unity and equality among all humankind in general
and the Muslim community in particular (Siddiqi, 2000). The Islamic
law "Hisbah" (commanding good and forbidding evil) says that
citizens are, as far as their conditions and capabilities permit,
entitled to speak and to act in pursuit of what in their enlightened
judgment seems good, or they likewise can forbid whether in words,
acts or silent denunciation, any evil which they see being
committed. Last and not least, Nasihah (sincere advice) is s
friendly or sincere counsel to others when one is convinced of the
essential benefit of his advice whether it is in social, political,
or personal matters (Kamali, cited in Dick, 1997).
Conclusion
This paper proves the inability of both clash of
cultures and global culture perspectives to offer a democratic,
peaceful and just intercultural communication in the era of
globalization. It also demonstrates the fundamental principles of
the Islamic intercultural communication perspective which is capable
to overcome the problems generated by the other alternatives and
provides the globe with the values of tolerances, freedom,
democracy, equity, balance, justice, modernity, rationality and
peaceful coexistence. The main conclusion the paper finds is that
the humankind is in bad need to support the efforts that enable the
Third Way perspective to replace dominance with tolerance, the
monoculture with multiple cultures and clashes with peace. Finally,
I would like to emphasize the issue addressed by many Western and
Muslim scholars which is of great significance to our present
discussion: If we are to see a more positive Euro- American
appreciation of Islam, all the misconceptions which each side holds
concerning the other need to be re-examined. The idea of the whole
West minus its Muslim minorities all being anti-Islam is as false as
the idea of the monolithic Muslim world that is totally united
politically in its jihad against Western civilization.
References
Ahmed, Akbar S, (1992), Postmodernism and Islam,
London and New York, Routledge.
Al Hewar Editorial: January 2002.
Http://www.Alhewar.com
Ali Nadvi, Abdul Hasan, (1978). Islam: The Most
Suitable Religion for Mankind in Gauhar Altaf (ed), The challenges
of Islam, London, Islamic Council of Europe.
As’ad Abukhalil, (1999), The future of Islam and the
West: Clash of Civilization or Peaceful Coexistence, American
Political Science Review.
Braibanti, Ralph, (1999), Islam and the West: Common
Cause or Clash? The American Journal of Islamic School Sciences,
Volume 16, Spring 1999.
Dick, Robert C and Robinson Brenda M, (1997),
Islamic World Views and Global Vis – a – Vis Effective Intercultural
Communication, paper presented at World Communication Association
Fourteenth Biennial Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica, ED: 409 601.
Ellingsen, T. (2000). The New World Order: Global
village or civilizational clashes? paper presented at the 18th
conference of the International Peace Research Association in
Tampere, Finland, 5-9 August.
Esposito, John l, (2002), Unholy War, Terror in the
Name of Islam, Oxford New York, Oxford University Press.
Hafez Kai, (2000), Islam and the West: The Clash of
Politicized Perception , in Hafez Kai (ed), The Islamic World and
the West, Leiden. Boston. Kolon, Brill.
Hamada, Basyouni (2002 a), Al Jazeera TV and
September 11, 2001: An Arab Islamic World View of Terrorism, paper
presented at the international forum of the National French Audio
Visual Institute, Paris, France.
Hamada, Basyouni (2002 b), Reflections on Arab TV
and Arab National Identity, paper presented at the international
forum of the National French Audio Visual Institute, Paris, France.
Hamada, Basyouni (2000), Islamic Cultural Theory,
Arab Media Performance and Public Opinion, in Slavko Splichal, (ed),
Public Opinion and Democracy, New Jersey, Hampton Press.
Hassan, Mohd Kamal, (1994), The Islamic World View,
in Yaacob, Abdul Monir, and Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Faiz, ( eds) Towards
a Positive Islamic World –View: Malaysian and American Perception,
Kuala Lumpur, Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia.
Hoffman, Murad, (2000a), Islam and the West,
http://www.viewislam.com/west/murad4.htm
Hoffman, Murad, (2000b), Islam and the West,
http://www.viewislam.com/west/murad2.htm
Keniston, Kenneth, (1999), Cultural Diversity or
Global Monoculture, in Christoph Engel and Kenneth H. Keeller (eds),
Understanding the Impact of Global Networks on Local, Social,
Political and Cultural Values,
http://www.mpp.rdg.mpg.de/woodsh.htm
Kramer, Gudrun, (2000). Visions of an Islamic
Republic Good Governance According to the Islamists, in Hafez Kai (ed),
The Islamic World and the West, Leiden. Boston. Kolon, Brill.
Malek, Abbas & Wiegand, Krists E. , (1997), Islam
and the West: Cultural Encounter, in Kamalipour, Yahya R. (ed), The
U.S. Media and the Middle East: Images and Perceptions, Westport,
Connecticut, London, Pracger.
Maududi, Abul Al’a, (1978), What Islam Stands for in
Gauhar Altaf (ed), The challenges of Islam, London, Islamic Council
of Europe.
Mazrui, Ali A, (1998), Islam, Western Democracy and
the Third Industrial Revolution: Conflict or Convergence, Emirates
Lecture 17, The Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research,
Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mazrui, Ali A, (1980), The Moving Cultural Frontier
of World Order: From Monotheism to North- South Relations, paper
presented at the Working Group on " Culture, Power, and Global
Transformations" of the World Order Models Project (Lisbon,
Portugal, July 13-20. ED: 214 854.
Moratinos Miguel Angel, (1999), Europe and the
Muslim World in International Relations in Murtin Gema Martin, (ed)
Islam, Modernism and the West, Cultural and Political Relations at
the End of the Millennium, London, New York, I. B. Tauris Publisher.
Munoz Gema Martin, 1999 Islam and the West, An
International Duality, in Murtin Gema Martin, "ed" Islam, Modernism
and the West, Cultural and Political Relations at the End of the
Millennium, London, New York, I. B. Tauris Publisher.
Muzaffar, Chandra, (2000), Japan, Islam & the West:
Peaceful Coexistence or Conflict? An Asian Muslim Viewpoint.
http://www.Jaring.my/just/asia.japan.htm.
Siddiqi, Mohammad A, (2000), New Media of
Information Age and Islamic Ethics, Paper presented at the IAMCR
2000 Conference Technology, Industry and the Citizen in the Age of
Globalization, Singapore, 17-20 July.
Taher, Hamed, (1997), Islam Between Truth and False
Allegations, a Response to the False Allegations Against Islam,
Rabat, Kingdom of Morocco, Publications of the Islamic Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
TBS, Issue No.2, Spring 1999.
http://www.tbsjournal.com/archives/spring99/articles/alterman/alterman2.html
Wheeler, Deborah, (2000), New Media, Globalization
and Kuwaiti Identity, The Middle East Journal, V 54.
Yaacob, Abdul Monir, and Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Faiz,
(1994), Towards a Positive Islamic World –View: Malaysian and
American Perception, Kuala Lumpur, Institute of Islamic
Understanding Malaysia.